Record levels of adoptive families!

Michael Gove’s drive to speed up the adoption process has sent the number of children in care placed with permanent families to record levels.

Almost 4,000 children in care were adopted in England in the year from April 2012 and March 2013 – the highest figure since comparable records began in 1992. The figure is up 15 per cent in a single year.

Although exactly comparable records do not exist beyond the early 1990s, it is thought they are now running at their highest level since the 1960s. It follows separate figures released by the Office for National Statistics last month showing that the total number of adoption orders – which include children being formally adopted by step-parents – also reached record levels.

But they showed that fewer babies were adopted than ever before because of the length of time the process still takes.

The new figures show that 3,980 children were adopted from care in the year to March 2013, up from 3,470 the previous year.

There has also been a major increase in the number of children in care placed with foster parents – which is seen as a key step towards adoption under the Government’s reforms. In March this year there were 50,900 children in a foster placement – a 16 per cent increase over the last four years.

The Education Secretary, who was himself adopted as a baby, and the children’s minister Edward Timpson, who grew up in a family which took in scores of foster children, have led a high-profile drive to increase adoption levels.
Mr Gove has spoken of the need to “evacuate” children from neglectful or abusive settings and placed in loving, stable families.

Children and families Minister Edward Timpson said: “It is hugely encouraging that the number of children adopted from care has risen to the highest level yet – but too many children are still waiting too long for stable, loving homes.”

Well this looks all very encouraging for the government, particularly with the extensive reforms to try and push up the speed of the adoption process. My only concern is that there doesn’t appear to be any sign of whether these children are actually satisfied in those homes. We are probably expected to believe that they are, but until any sort of statistic mentioning that is published, I don’t want to be jumping up and down too soon.


3 thoughts on “Record levels of adoptive families!

  1. As an adoptive parent I welcome this news from the Government, its always good to hear that the process has been sped up (it took us 2 years). However, I disagree with your comment saying you’d want to know if children are “satisfied” with their placements, this isn`t a situation like being in a hotel room, not liking the decor and asking to be moved. The process if far deeper than this. Matching is a complicated process (especially with older children, who may have been in foster homes for a greater amount of time), it works from both sides, there are many people involved, from social workers for each party to those who monitor placements to see if they are successful. Remember many of the children who have come through the adoption system will have experienced some form of abuse or neglect, and will be over the moon to have someone who will love, protect and cherish them forever.

    1. Hi there Matt, thanks for taking the time to read and comment 🙂

      I’m aware of a lot of the situations, my Nan’s a retired social worker who used to deal with adoptions etc. It’s true that the system is lengthy and a lot of precautions are taken to ensure that the children are in the best possible care, but it is it not true that the system can indeed go wrong, despite all these steps? My concern is that the speeding up of the process may lead to some steps not being addressed as carefully, reducing the success rate. What I would love to see is a record of the number of incidents where these errors occur, and then after these reforms have taken place, then clock another statistic. If the number of misjudgements and errors increases it does pose a question of what needs to be done to make sure it is reduced again, which could of course mean the time taken to complete the process may need to be increased again.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s