A Grammar School not what it’s cracked up to be …

Chatham Grammar School for Boys in Kent has been given the lowest possible rating by schools inspectors. Following an Ofsted inspection in June, it received an inadequate grading, which places it in special measures. The school, which is an academy and not run by the local authority, is the first grammar school in Kent and Medway to be placed in special measures.

Its leadership and management came in for criticism because achievement “had not improved quickly enough” since the previous inspection. Headteacher David Marshall announced his retirement last week and has not returned for the new school year.

Ofsted inspectors highlighted “weak and inadequate teaching” and said teachers did not “consistently plan lessons that challenge students and extend their thinking or give students detailed verbal and written feedback”.

They also found the achievements of students were “not consistently good”, and that leaders and governors did not check the progress of different groups of students accurately, while sixth form students’ progress was “too variable across subjects”.

Behaviour in lessons had also declined since the previous Ofsted inspection. However, the report said students’ behaviour around the school was good, and pupils with special educational needs made good progress because of “well-targeted support”.

Interim executive principal Denise Shepherd and interim principal Stuart Gardner were asked by the chair of governors to move from their posts at the Rochester Grammar School, where they had the same roles, to run the school. Ms Shepherd said some of her senior staff from Rochester would also assist colleagues at the Chatham school as they took the school forward “into a new era of achievement”.

In a letter to parents she said the Ofsted report did not mean the school was failing. “It has an academic record that many schools would be proud of, with 95% of pupils achieving five or more A*-C GCSEs including English and Mathematics. The inspectors’ concerns were over the rate of improvement in some areas of development and that is why we have been asked by the trustees and chair of governors to work with the school,” Ms Shepherd said. “We have already started the work of rapidly improving the effectiveness of leadership and management.” She added that as part of the process of improvement, lessons and teacher involvement across the curriculum would be regularly monitored.

This to me is a little bit of a sad state of affairs. Grammar schools are selective and are only taking the top percentages of ability pupils, so it is bizarre that a school that has a 95% pass rate is placed under special measures. It is also stupid from Ofsted to place them under special measures when they are changing at the top of the school leadership chain. If you’re looking for ‘improvement’ in terms of attainment, well that would be difficult in a grammar school because they’re already achieving a ridiculously high attainment rate. Obviously in terms of teaching there are issues with this school, mostly due to lack of monitoring, but these are now on the mend. I personally don’t see the need for special measures here when a school is going through a transition period. It seems to me to be an unnecessary pressure which the school could do without.


One thought on “A Grammar School not what it’s cracked up to be …

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s